Investigative Reporter Performance Review Example
Are you looking for help setting up a performance review checklist so that when you have your HR review meeting with your Investigative Reporter, you can ensure you’re covering all the best practice areas? In the outline below, we give an outline of each section of the performance review template with tips, including employee information, performance summary, KPAs for your Investigative Reporter, goal achievement, strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, performance review comments, a development plan and more.
Employee Information
Basic details such as name, job title (Investigative Reporter), department, review period, and reviewer’s name. This sets the context and ensures accurate documentation.
Performance Summary
In the Performance Summary section for an investigative reporter, the review should encapsulate the reporter’s ability to uncover and present compelling stories that have had a significant impact on the audience and the organization. It should highlight their investigative skills, including thorough research, fact-checking, and the ability to navigate complex topics. The summary should also address the reporter’s adherence to ethical journalism standards and their effectiveness in meeting deadlines. Additionally, it should recognize their contributions to team collaborations and their role in enhancing the publication’s reputation. Overall, the summary should reflect the reporter’s growth, adaptability to new challenges, and their influence in driving important conversations through their investigative work.
Key Performance Areas (KPAs)
In a performance review for an investigative reporter, the Key Performance Areas should encompass several critical aspects. Technical skills are essential, focusing on the reporter’s ability to conduct thorough research, verify facts, and utilize investigative tools effectively. Productivity and efficiency should assess the reporter’s ability to meet deadlines while managing multiple stories. Collaboration and communication are vital, evaluating how well the reporter works with editors, sources, and colleagues to produce comprehensive stories. Quality of work is paramount, examining the depth, accuracy, and impact of the stories produced. Additionally, ethical considerations should be included, ensuring adherence to journalistic standards and integrity. These KPAs provide a comprehensive evaluation of the reporter’s competencies and contributions to the newsroom, aligning with the demands of investigative journalism.
Goal Achievement
In the Goal Achievement section of a performance review for an investigative reporter, it is crucial to assess the progress made toward previously set investigative goals, such as the completion of in-depth stories, the uncovering of significant information, and the impact of their reporting on public awareness or policy change. This evaluation should consider the reporter’s ability to meet deadlines, the quality and depth of their research, and their effectiveness in using sources and data to support their findings. Additionally, it should highlight any innovative approaches taken to overcome challenges and the reporter’s adaptability in dynamic news environments. Identifying areas where the reporter excelled and where they may need additional resources or support will help in setting future goals and enhancing their investigative capabilities.
Strengths and Accomplishments
In the Strengths and Accomplishments section of a performance review for an investigative reporter, it is essential to highlight their exceptional research skills, ability to uncover hidden truths, and dedication to ethical journalism. Emphasize their knack for developing compelling stories that have a significant impact on public awareness and policy change. Recognize their persistence in pursuing leads and their skill in building a network of reliable sources. Acknowledge their ability to work under tight deadlines while maintaining accuracy and depth in reporting. Highlight any awards or recognitions received for their work, as well as any notable stories that have led to meaningful societal change. By celebrating these strengths and accomplishments, you reinforce the reporter’s valuable contributions to the field of journalism and encourage continued excellence.
Areas for Improvement
In the Areas for Improvement section of a performance review for an investigative reporter, it is important to focus on enhancing skills that will bolster their journalistic impact. Emphasize the need for sharpening research techniques to uncover deeper insights and encourage the development of more diverse sources to enrich storytelling. Highlight the importance of meeting deadlines without compromising accuracy, as timely reporting is crucial in journalism. Suggest refining interviewing skills to elicit more compelling narratives and recommend workshops or mentorship for honing writing clarity and conciseness. Address any tendencies to overlook editorial feedback, stressing the value of collaboration with editors to enhance story quality. By providing specific examples and actionable steps, this feedback should inspire the reporter to elevate their craft while maintaining motivation and commitment to journalistic excellence.
Development Plan and Goals for the Next Period
In the Development Plan and Goals for the Next Period section of a performance review for an investigative reporter, it is essential to outline objectives that enhance both their journalistic skills and their alignment with the organization’s mission. This could involve setting SMART goals such as increasing the number of in-depth investigative pieces published by 20% over the next year, or completing a specialized training program in data journalism within six months to improve analytical capabilities. Additionally, pursuing mentorship opportunities with senior reporters can provide valuable insights and guidance. Encouraging the reporter to obtain certifications in digital media tools or investigative techniques can further bolster their skill set. These goals should be designed to not only advance the reporter’s career but also to contribute meaningfully to the newsroom’s overall impact and reputation.
Rating Scale
A rating scale (e.g., 1-5 or “Needs Improvement” to “Exceeds Expectations”) standardizes feedback and makes performance levels more understandable.
Employee Comments
A space for your Investigative Reporter employee to share their thoughts, feedback, or concerns about their review. This encourages dialogue and helps employees feel engaged in the process.
Signatures and Date
Signatures from both the Investigative Reporter employee and reviewer indicate that the review was discussed and agreed upon, making it official and fostering accountability.
Building your Investigative Reporter Performance Review template
From reading through the items in the example Investigative Reporter checklist template above, you’ll now have an idea of how you can apply best practices to running Investigative Reporter performance review meetings. Need help getting started? Scroll up to get a template that will save you hours of time.